On 04/04/2012 10:36 PM, Tim Jones wrote:
On Apr 4, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Richmond wrote:
Interesting enough, he mentioned to me that he had had great problems to do
with getting a Linux port of HyperNext off the ground,
and stated:
"With hindsight I should have kept developing the Pascal version of HyperNext"
which seems most odd indeed.
I suspect that this is because the older version of RS he's using to get the
PPC / OS9 compatibility dates back to the 5.0 release days and things on Linux
were very fresh and depended on a very archaic (now) version of GTK.
The later versions of RS are much more complete and completely on par with the
other platforms.
Tim
_______________________________________________
You are quite right; I just had this from the HyperNext chap:
"we are legally safe because we are still using RB 555 from a long time
ago and when we started they had no such constraints.We still have the
original license agreements"
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
