Mark Schonewille wrote:
> I believe RealStudio WE does everything we can reasonably expect from
> an HTML5 app.
Qualified with "reasonably expect" in terms of automated translation, I
would agree.
Here's a nifty HTML5 app that's the sort of thing one can also make in
RB for the desktop (and similar in some ways to your nice flowchart app
made with LC), but I don't see anything in their WE which would automate
such translation for the web:
<http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/>
Here's one that's reflective of the sort of multimedia techniques used
in CBTs - easy to do in RB, but not translatable in WE:
<http://vlog.it/>
Here's a painting program, similar to some I've seen made with LC and RB
but again I've seen nothing on the BR WE which would suggest that can be
automatically translated:
<http://mugtug.com/sketchpad/>
So I agree that it's not reasonable to expect an automated translation
solution to offer much more than simple list and form views.
But I don't think that's going to suffice for the sort of stuff
LiveCoders want from a one-click web solution.
> It is funny that you consider HTML5 traditional already, but I do
> tend to agree.
What I wrote was:
...RealBASIC's Web Edition seems like a very useful thing.
But it assumes that you want to make a fairly traditional
client-server database app comprised of list and form views.
I didn't use the word "traditional" to describe any specific version of
HTML, nor even HTML itself. I was referring to the useful but fairly
narrowly focused range of UIs the RB WE can produce.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
