On 01/03/2012, at 09:44 AM, Terry Judd wrote:

Thanks - I'll give that a go.

Sent from my iPhone

On 01/03/2012, at 9:14 AM, "Bjoernke von Gierke" 
<b...@mac.com<mailto:b...@mac.com>> wrote:

Preferences -> Composing -> Increase quote level

(just below "Quote the text of the original message")


On 29.02.2012, at 23:01, Terry Judd wrote:

You can probably blame Apple mail for that.

Hmm - now that I'm at my desktop it appears I'd already done that. I wonder how 
this one looks ;)


Terry...

Sent from my iPhone

On 01/03/2012, at 8:46 AM, "Bob Sneidar" <b...@twft.com<mailto:b...@twft.com>> 
wrote:

Not to be too critical, but it is nearly impossible for me to read this as a 
thread when prior conversations are not "quoted" in some way to distinguish 
them from the actual post. My mind gives up trying.

Bob


On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Terry Judd wrote:


On 01/03/2012, at 12:19 AM, Dave Cragg wrote:


On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:49, Terry Judd wrote:

Hi guys - we have a reasonably complex Livecode app that makes lots of server 
requests - typically initiated by posting data to php routines on a secure 
(https) server.  Generally things work well but occasionally things go awry and 
we start seeing slowdowns and odd errors (including the dreaded 'previous 
request not completed'), particularly if a number of requests are made in 
relatively quick succession.

Anyway, I was wondering whether there was any advantage to closing the open 
socket as soon as any data is returned rather than waiting for it close itself 
(there is a timeout interval of 5 seconds), thereby forcing any new request to 
open a new socket rather than using an 'old' open one?

If all the requests are to http urls, you could try adding a "Connection: 
close" header.

set the httpHeaders to "Connection: close"

This may not solve all the problems you are seeing, but it should cause the 
remote server to close the connection after replying and include a suitable 
header in its response. This will cause libUrl to close the socket and not 
attempt to use an already open one for subsequent requests. I've seen this 
solve problems where Livecode doesn't immediately recognize that a socket has 
been closed remotely and attempts to re-use it, resulting in an error.

Dave

Thanks Dave, that sounds promising. I'll give it a go.

Terry...

Dr Terry Judd
Senior Lecturer in Medical Education
Medical Eduction Unit
Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
The University of Melbourne



Dr Terry Judd
Senior Lecturer in Medical Education
Medical Eduction Unit
Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences
The University of Melbourne



_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to