Yes, I believe you're right! I believe I'm seeing the revBrowser.dll rather than the main browser.
Is that the only option? On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:14 PM, DeeCee <davidoco...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Maybe the other Chip (Chipp Walters) can answer this correctly since he did > the initial development work on the original revBrowser external, but > several of the browser controls that I've seen in use with other > development > tools, require the presence of the ATL.dll to function. -and- there may be > different versions of the same file in use, depending on the tool. > > For example, I'm running a Windows 7 box that has both 32 & 64 bit versions > of Windows Explorer 9, yet I have a total of (4) ATL.dll files present in > the system: > > (1) ATL80.dll Version 8.0.50727.4053 > (3) ATL71.dll Version 7.10.3077.0 > > What you *may* be seeing is the version of the library file (DLL) that is > used by the revBrowser control, rather than the main browser version that > is > installed on the machine. Sorry, but I don't have any working code at the > moment to see what is being reported from the revBrowser. > > HTH, > DeeCee > > -- > View this message in context: > http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/revBrowser-Internet-Explorer-tp4429973p4430681.html > Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
