Hi Robert, Still trying different things here to see which seems to work best in these circumstances. I have put a separate label, as you suggest, I think that works well. Pete
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Robert Brenstein <r...@robelko.com> wrote: > On 18.02.2012 at 13:28 Uhr -0800 Pete apparently wrote: > >> In spite of all that, I share your concerns. Using the autohilite >> property >> was a very easy way out of the original question but perhaps the image >> approach might be better and not a lot more work if I use a behavior >> script. If I make it look sufficiently different form a normal checkbox >> with no hilite just a symbol of some sort to indicate true or false, that >> might be the best solution. >> > > In some cases, simply disabling the checkbox gives a clue that it can't be > change, whereas you can still set its hilite through script. You would > probably want to display the associated text in a field not as label of the > checkbox, though. > > Robert > > > ______________________________**_________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode> > > -- Pete Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com> _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
