Yes the more I think about it, the more tedious it becomes. It seems the only 
way to do multiuser dev is to have the source stack available to a kind of 
checkout engine. A dev would have to check out an object at which point it 
would be unavailable to any other user. And you would have to have a running 
copy that was the exact replica of the original including ID's. Not sure how to 
do that. 

Way back when some made the argument that it was a bad idea to use ID's as 
references to objects. Now it seems we understand much more how true that is. 
We are beyond the point of know return now. :-)

Bob


On Jan 24, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Pete wrote:

> Bob,
> I think you'd have to find some way to preserve object IDs or a lot of
> stuff would break.  Datagrids, for example, store the row template as a
> long id.  And, as you pointed out, behaviors.


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to