Yes the more I think about it, the more tedious it becomes. It seems the only way to do multiuser dev is to have the source stack available to a kind of checkout engine. A dev would have to check out an object at which point it would be unavailable to any other user. And you would have to have a running copy that was the exact replica of the original including ID's. Not sure how to do that.
Way back when some made the argument that it was a bad idea to use ID's as references to objects. Now it seems we understand much more how true that is. We are beyond the point of know return now. :-) Bob On Jan 24, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Pete wrote: > Bob, > I think you'd have to find some way to preserve object IDs or a lot of > stuff would break. Datagrids, for example, store the row template as a > long id. And, as you pointed out, behaviors. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode