Jacque- Monday, January 16, 2012, 1:28:22 PM, you wrote:
> I'm not sure it's really a bug. I think the "last" keyword refers to the > highest-numbered object. If you put an object into a group, it won't be > the highest number unless the enclosing group is also the highest > numbered object. English is such a weird language. Yes, "last" in this case refers to the group with the highest number (layer) rather than the last-created of last-referenced group. So it's not a bug per se (note that the "last" object is only not the last-referenced one if it was created inside a group, and then only if it's not the object of its type in that group with the highest-numbered layer), but just an ambiguity of natural language processing. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
