Right. It seems like it would be easier to clone a stack, then reset everything in it, or just keep a copy of a virgin stack around. You would have to update it every time you made any changes to the original though.
Bob On Dec 28, 2011, at 1:51 PM, stephen barncard wrote: > A while ago I experimented with saving complete descriptions of livecode > objects as text with some success. It was possible to get most, but not all > properties in repeat loops, however I found that the recursive code needed > to bury within groups of groups was just too time consuming to be worth it. > It was pointless to continue, the packaging I desired was much more > easily handled and portable with the Livecode containers. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
