Thanks for explaining, Francis. Yes, I agree that one level of quoting is sufficient, but I also believe it is necessary.
-- Best regards, Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer KvK: 50277553 Become our partner in sales http://qery.us/16r Start selling Color Converter today. 20% commission! On 12 nov 2011, at 11:37, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote: > Hi to all who may have had problems understanding > my very bad English, > > You are correct, I did mention 6 and 7 levels, > I felt sure that many of you would think that this > is a little excessive. > > Of course, Mark, I agree that one level is perfectly > acceptable, IF the mail is counsel, or an answer > to a question. It saves people scrabbling to find > out what the question was ........ :>) > > And it is certainly useful to those who don't consult > the forum regularly. > > As for those who thought my thread wasted more > disk space than 6/7 levels of repetition over an > indeterminate period of time, I'm sure you would > grudgingly agree that this is obviously false. > > I hope this closes the debate. > > -Francis > > "Nothing should ever be done for the first time !" _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
