My bad I missed that part. I just read "sensory stuff" in the reply post.
Bob On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Pete wrote: > I think the original post talked about keying in a number to get the right > recording? I know users aren't always the smartest people in the world > (including myself as one) but if I see a big number next to an object and > the app is telling me to key in a number, I'm pretty sure I could figure > that out! > > I think we sometimes get carried away with trying to squeeze the last drop > of blood out of possible technological implementations when a lower tech > approach would work just as well, if not better. > > Pete > Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Bob Sneidar <b...@twft.com> wrote: > >> The only thing that comes to mind that an iPhone would be able to use is a >> barcode. You would have to be able to access the camera, and the older >> iPhones have crappy cameras so no workie with them. Seems like a non-starter >> right there, especially if you want the user to actually scan the bar code! >> >> Otherwise you would need a proprietary device that detected a minimum >> physical distance to a sensor node to trigger the appropriate recording, >> which plugged into the bottom of the iPhone, which means design and >> manufacturing and all that. Without that it's all academic isn't it? >> >> Bob >> >> >> On Sep 7, 2011, at 7:03 PM, stephen barncard wrote: >> >>> THe programming is the fun part. Getting the right recording to trigger >> is >>> the hard part. Something that uses the sensory stuff in the phone, can't >>> depend on users to sort it out. >>> _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
