Le 2025-03-17 10:01, Alex Tweedly via use-livecode a écrit :
That sounds quite likely. If handler1 is running continuously, then
other messages will not happen.
I'd suggest putting various
wait for 0 seconds with messages
inside the running loops of handler1, in order that pending messages
can be dealt with.
Alex.
Yes, I thought of that, I even inserted numerous "handler2" commands
in handler1, but the idea was to have messages to "handler2" sent in
a very regular way, no matter what happens in handler1.
And inserting commands in handler1 will break that regularity, for
they will be scattered among the script...
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
