Personally, My 'take' on LiveCode is that, generally, it is ideal for boutique programming, for specific free-standing applications.
It is also excellent for teaching children programming concepts in a relatively digestable way without dumbing programming down in the way block-coding efforts such as Scratch do. As such, there will always be very few advertisements for LiveCode programmers. That should not, in any way, devalue LiveCode. On Mon, 29 Aug 2022, 21:56 Richard Gaskin via use-livecode, < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Gregg wrote: > > > https://spectrum.ieee.org/top-programming-languages-2022 > > Demand. > > Their methodology note explains it's based on job listings. When was the > last time you saw a job posting for LC skills? > > It's also a short list (50?). > > This one ranks by usage, listing the hundred most popular, where LC has > only been in the top 50 a few times over the years I've been tracking > it, but is often in the bottom 50 (out of hundreds of languages not so > bad): > > https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World Systems > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
