Well, you could set up your rules and just database the exceptions.  Then you 
at least have a guess for the words that you don’t “know” the answer for.  If 
there is a database miss, then use the rule set.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 21, 2022, at 8:27 PM, Rick Harrison via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> I’ve tried a bunch of things. It’s 80-90% correct, but failing 10-20% of the 
> time due to irregulars isn’t acceptable.
> I think I have to look into a database table lookup solution, but I’m 
> dreading it.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rick
> 
>> On Mar 21, 2022, at 4:18 PM, Craig Newman via use-livecode 
>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Such cases are rare, certainly, but “queue” comes to mind. I am sure that a 
>> vowel parsing routine will be reasonably accurate, but not perfect, as per 
>> the previous example.
>> 
>> A quick search did not turn up any “list of all words and their syllable 
>> count”, but there still might be one. One site mentioned that algorithms 
>> were being used, but were “not perfect”.
>> 
>> Craig
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to