My two pesos, following these comments.... Sean: > they leave something as *basic as this > unrepaired for EIGHT....TEEN....YEARS !?! Jacqueline: > they have to make considered choices in what to address > at any given time given the resources available to them. Bernard: > At least the new licensing model should allow LC to prioritise > based on what customers use. > IMO the open source initiative was the single biggest mistake Bob: > I survived the age of freeware. Richard: > Heather politely called cheese on this topic some time ago. > May we please respect the wishes of the list owner? (Curry:) I propose reducing the attempts to silence one another? That cheese remark doesn't sound like a very accurate portrayal; that license change topic had simply been discussed enough. No need to conflate that with this tiny celebration of better priorities. If we outlaw positive feedback too, what will be left? Maybe you'll direct us what to say? My apologies if I'm wrong (been sick going on 2 months, haven't read everything) but all of the comments on priorities, and the same-name parent topic make really good points as far as I've read. (Including Richard's on the parent thread.) Reality is a complex world. We need to respect the limitations of real people and resources. LC can't be everything to everyone for 99 cents. They've done some great things. But we also need to respect a variety of opinions. Otherwise we handicap ourselves, as we've learned. There was a time not long ago when this list was dominated by only a handful of people. 90% of the time we heard only a few voices. Result? For those few people, maybe it was OK. Their own personal needs drove their priorities and they drove conversation around their desires. For everyone else, maybe not quite so great. I like hearing different views. You learn things. A big +1 from me to a lot of varied comments. Different people have different needs and priorities. Let's be willing to listen more. I'll shut up now and go back to read/lurk/work. :) (I'm gradually doing a WordLib update ... still sick. Fairly low chance of me monitoring any replies here; this is intended as my single post for the week.) Best wishes, Curry Kenworthy Custom Software Development "Better Methods, Better Results" LiveCode Training and Consulting http://livecodeconsulting.com/ _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: OT: Priorities (was: Re: Stack with the same name loop)
Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:24:52 -0700
- Re: Stack with the same name loop Eraklis Pittas via use-livecode
- Re: Stack with the same name loop Mark Wieder via use-livecode
- Re: Stack with the same name loo... J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
- Re: Stack with the same name... Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
- Re: Stack with the same name loo... Sean Cole (Pi) via use-livecode
- OT: Priorities (was: Re: Sta... J. Landman Gay via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorities (was:... Pi Digital via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorities (was:... Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorities ... Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Paul McClernan via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Richmond via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Paul McClernan via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Bernard Devlin via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Richmond via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
- Re: OT: Priorit... Bob Sneidar via use-livecode