What do you mean with standard? Do you mean that some combined codepoints show up as one glyph and your question is if there is one codepoint for every such combination? Or do you mean that several seemingly identical glyphs might have different codepoints? Unicode actually has a good introduction on their site: https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode10.0.0/ch01.pdf that might answer some of your questions.
:-Håkan On 15 Nov 2020, 11:16 +0100, scott--- via use-livecode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>, wrote: > I’m a little over my head in this area so I may not be describing this quite > right… > Some unicode glyphs seem to be describable with different (arrangements of) > codepoints. Is it possible to coerce the glyph to be described in a > “standard” way? > > -- > Scott Morrow > > Elementary Software > (Now with 20% less chalk dust!) > web https://elementarysoftware.com/ > email sc...@elementarysoftware.com > booth 1-360-734-4701 > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
