Pi Digital wrote:

> Here’s my take (for what it’s worth). Although Unix is used in 71.6%
> (source: w3techs.com) of all known websites as of today and Linux only
> 29.0%, at least we have ‘a’ distro that works on some server.

That struck me as odd, so I took a moment to see how they derived that impressive Unix number (thanks for including the source).

It turns out they're lumping Unix and Linux together under "Unix" - when you click "Unix" you get this breakdown:

   Subcategories of Unix

   This diagram shows the percentages of websites using various
   subcategories of Unix.

   How to read the diagram:
   Linux is used by 40.5% of all the websites who use Unix

   Websites who use Unix
   Linux       40.5%
   BSD          0.5%
   Darwin     less than 0.1%
   HP-UX      less than 0.1%
   Solaris    less than 0.1%
   Minix      less than 0.1%
   Unknown    59.0%

I'd wager most of the 59% using "Unknown" are also Linux.

That would line up well enough with what we see at the Wikipedia page for server OS market share:

                              Linux   FreeBSD    Unknown  Windows
   W3Cook         July 2015    96.4%     1.7%       0%      1.9%
   W3Techs        Feb  2015    35.9%   0.95%       30.9%   32.3%
   Security Space  Feb 2014   <79.3%     N/A               >20.7%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Public_servers_on_the_Internet

While Windows has a strong showing in the enterprise for internal servers, public-facing servers are by far a Linux story.

This is not only true for most shared and VPS hosting, but public clouds as well, with Google, Amazon, and Apple all using Linux to drive their infrastructure, and even though Azure is a Win/Linux mix there's a surprising amount of Linux going on there (with Ubuntu being the leading choice inside containers).

I bring this up not just because I'm a Linux fanboy (though I am and make no apologies; I was even worse when I used to be a Mac fanboy <g>), but just as a long-winded way to help support your main thesis:

Aside from new architectures like Linux ARM (Raspberry Pi), the most commonly-used platforms where LiveCode Serer would be used are well supported.

So, as you wrote:

> Seriously, if anyone was considering doing this, please..., please,
> reconsider and put your efforts and talent into fixing what we already
> have. It would be far more beneficial to a much greater community
> population.

There may be many useful requests in the bug DB worth considering to improve the performance, robustness, and feature set of LC Server.

But Heriberto's up for an adventure, one enhancement that would lower RAM use and speed things up a bit is this one:

https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=14115

Heriberto, if that's interesting to you let me know. I have a workaround in place now, and I'll bet there's a way to move that inside the engine for a solution that's much simpler than when we discussed it here on this list earlier this year.

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 ____________________________________________________________________
 ambassa...@fourthworld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to