That is strange. Choosing two points „at random“ should give a ratio of 1/3. 

At least if you choose them by generating two random numbers between 0 and 360 
and use this numbers as angles between a fixed line connecting  the centre 
(e.g. the x-axis) and the line between the centre and the chosen point. 
Something like (without access to any LiveCode)
put Random(360) *pi / 180 into angle1. 
put sin (angle1) * radius into p1y
put cos (angle1) * radius into p1x
That’s the method I would choose. 
How do you choose the two points?

Thomas



> Am 05.09.2020 um 17:11 schrieb Roger Guay via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>:
> 
> My intent was not to suggest that math is “really’ broken in the Bertrand 
> Paradox, but it did make me wonder what is going on. 
> Enter LC. I built a simulation of your description where each of two points 
> on a circle are randomly chosen. This kind of chord generation is 
> consistently producing a ratio of about ½ which, of course, disagrees with 2 
> of the methods in the BP, but is close to one of them. 
> I don’t mean to promote controversy here . . . I am just having fun playing 
> with this and wondering what is indeed going on???
> Thanks for playing, Thomas.
> 
> Roger
> 
>>>> On Sep 5, 2020, at 12:24 AM, Thomas von Fintel via use-livecode 
>>>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>> Having had no contact with Bertrand Paradox except reading the Wikipedia 
>> entries in English and German, my impression is that this is not a case of 
>> broken math but a case of an ill-defined problem.
>> Saying that a chord of a circle is chosen at random seems to imply that all 
>> possible chords are chosen with the same probability. My interpretation 
>> would be that all points on the circle have the same probability and also 
>> every combination of two points have the same probability of being chosen. 
>> Not all methods proposed by Bertrand fulfil this requirement.
>> My interpretation may be wrong. But the fact that you need an interpretation 
>> shows that a problem like this needs more clarification.
>> Thomas
>>>> Am 05.09.2020 um 04:40 schrieb Roger Guay via use-livecode 
>>>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>:
>>> Bertrand Paradox
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to