Some of my users (who are still using the 32 bit version of Windows 7) pointed out that they couldn’t run the fancy “new” executable I posted… which I had newly compiled as 64 bit. So, that was a reason for me to go back and recompile as 32 bit. On Windows I suspect that most apps don't actually benefit much from 64 bit. — Scott Morrow
Elementary Software (Now with 20% less chalk dust!) web https://elementarysoftware.com/ email sc...@elementarysoftware.com booth 1-800-615-0867 ------------------------------------------------------ > On Apr 11, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Bill Vlahos via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > The default build choice in 9.5.1 is Windows 32bit not x86-64bit. > > Since the x86-64bit is not listed as experimental is there any reason why I > shouldn’t build for it instead of the default 32bit? > > Thank you, > Bill Vlahos > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
