Bob Sneidar wrote:
> I just discovered an interesting aspect of script only stacks. They
> CAN have Custom Properties… but ONLY while in memory! Once closed, the
> properties disappear. Seems like a slight mod would be able to save
> these properties as a separate file so that they can remain
> persistent.
Yep. So much of the difficulty folks have had using SoS come from just
over-thinking them.
A stack is a stack is a stack.
With script-only stacks there is one distinction: the storage format
contains only the stack script, and optionally a behavior reference.
That's it.
Everything else you can do with a stack at runtime can be done with any
stack, regardless of its storage format.
Indeed, nearly everything we see in the IDE these days are SoS.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
____________________________________________________________________
ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
