> Sean wrote: > > 4. As with 3 also, emscripten itself has capabilities built in that will > allow for this so I will more likely utilise these rather than use JQuery. > The idea will be to handle as much as possible within the emscripten code > and have minimal stuff within the HTML output other than anything the user > wants to add in.
[JQuery is only used for easier identifying DOM objects.] When doing "windowing" also look at the current implementation of "globalRect". This is not correct as it doesn't respect the scroll of the browser window what creates "jumping" stack windows. > 5. Thinking ahead, a way to add in JS functions an LC developer would want > included in the HTML output (from within LC) would be useful. Perhaps a > stack custom property that can hold the whole JS code that gets inserted at > deployment so that it builds as self contained. And/Or a way to access, > manipulate and/or set parameters of the HTML from within LC before > deployment (not at runtime). This could then include things like custom > layouts, loading bars, screen size handlers, php/Ajax/jquery comms, etc. Please leave out such things. These are extensions. But we could build a separate library of JS-extensions (updated with actual things from JS/CSS) that can be loaded if needed. And every beginner can insert JS from any LC container (do fld "JS1" as "javascript"). Thinking ahead? I'll extend my list not before 1.-4. is done: What I dislike most with LC is that too much projects are only halfway finished. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode