Wouldn't a binary script-only stack be the library stack we already have now?
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On January 14, 2020 9:55:01 AM Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
Since script-only stacks contain only a script with no properties, they
have no password property, and thus cannot be encrypted.
I had thought that including them in the Stacks pane of the Standalone
Builder might convert them to binary substacks, where the password could
apply. No dice.
Is it a bug that script-only stacks can't be imported into the stackfile
to become binary substacks?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
____________________________________________________________________
ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
