Forget to mention: when you start with this kind of procedures I always boot in
Recovery Mode and make a full image via Disk Utility to an external disk!!!
I have used in the past also Carbo Copy Cloner but an image contains also your
EFI and firmware setting. Never had any problems restoring an image.
My two cents.
On 20/10/2019, 19:53, "use-livecode on behalf of Erik Beugelaar via
use-livecode" <use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
Bill,
I haven't tried yet but this link will help you maybe:
https://www.howtoisolve.com/dual-boot-mac-install-macos-catalina-macos-mojave-two-macos-on-different-partition/
Regards,
Erik
On 20/10/2019, 19:13, "use-livecode on behalf of William Prothero via
use-livecode" <use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
Folks:
I have a bit of a worry about the Apple Catalina update. I want to keep
a bootable copy of the latest Mojave OS on an external disc. That way I can run
any older 32 bit programs I might need. However, I have a backup program
(Tri-Backup) that says it can’t make a bootable drive because of Apple
security. That has raised a bit of a red flag to me.
Currently, I use SuperDuper to make a bootable backup. SuperDuper isn’t
updated for Catalina yet, it seems.
What my worry is, is that perhaps Catalina’s new security settings
won’t allow booting from an external drive. That would completely eliminate my
option of having a 32 bit OS option for running older 32 bit software.
Anybody have any info relevant to this issue? Or perhaps I’m just being
paranoid (totally justifiably).
Best,
Bill
PS: sorry if this is a duplicate.
> On Oct 20, 2019, at 4:45 AM, Erik Beugelaar via use-livecode
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, I think you are right. I just dive into it after a long time but
that seems indeed the problem. As you know, running macOS from Hackintosh’s,
Security Boot must be disabled so as SIP (because of patching during boot). I
have not test yet to install Linux on my MacBook Pro though.
>
>
>
> OT: An interesting thread about running Catalina on older Mac’s can
be found here:
https://macandegg.com/2019/07/macos-catalina-patcher-10-15-on-old-macs/ incase
people want to install it on Mac ‘s before mid 2012.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: JJS <j...@krutt.org>
> Date: Sunday, 20 October 2019 at 12:52
> To: Erik Beugelaar <e.beugel...@me.com>, How to use LiveCode
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>
> Subject: Re: ... in iOS 13....
>
>
>
> It seems that when Secure Boot and SIP is disabled, then using Refind
https://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/index.html as bootloader you can get Linux
working too.
>
> I saw some discussions about the T2 and issues when powering off,
unplug power cable seems to trigger something.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/refind/discussion/general/thread/1475e30077/
>
> Op 20-10-2019 om 11:40 schreef Erik Beugelaar:
> The only thing what I don't like about the update policy of Apple is
you cannot use new apps from the Store if you cannot update to a new iOS
version without buying new hardware from Apple (esp. iPad's).
> And yes, the costs of the same specs of Apple hardware compared to PC
hardware are still 2 or 3 times more BUT the advantage is that you can run iOS
and Windows natively on the same machine. Since the introduction of Apple's T2
Security Chip it isn't possible to boot Linux on new Apple hardware like the
2018 MacBook Pro and Mac Mini anymore as far as I know.
> Furthermore, because of bad experiences upgrading macOS's in the
past, I don't upgrade to a the newest macOS version if there is no need for. It
has saved me a lot of frustrations...
> But I am not an advocate, I both like to work on Apple (macOS) and PC
(Windows/Linux) machines.
>
> On 20/10/2019, 11:18, "use-livecode on behalf of JJS via
use-livecode" <use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> What's unfair about it. Don't be offended.
>
> It's not against you or LC, it's not even entirely against Apple,
they
> have also good things. It's just an opinion.
>
> I believe there are more discussions about Apple issues on this
list
> than i see about Windows or Linux or Android.
>
> And for all 3 OS i also believe they are better backwards
compatible.
> (for Android i'm not talking about the sauce samsung and thelike
pour
> over it)
>
> A lot of people i see who have an Macbook or iOs device, is
because they
> want to show off that they can afford it, not of the reason that
it
> would be better or easier.
>
> I also understand that they want to close 32bit and move on,
except many
> customer are not ready. But slowly moving on.
>
> If people want it it's ok, but i see a lot of hassle that i
choose not
> to go for.
>
>
> Op 19-10-2019 om 22:36 schreef Pi Digital via use-livecode:
> > Jjs
> >
> > That’s an unfair statement, especially based on topic. It is
quite likely it is only a tiny update for Monte to fix. My experience says that
ALL OS systems/devices break bar none unless they don’t update at all and stay
stagnant. So which system do you prefer JJS? And remember only to mention one
that is completely infallible and never likely to break. Id especially love to
know a device name that is completely 100% future proof I can pitch to my
customers. As yet, the ‘most’ reliable I have found from a whole heap of
testing and long term experience are iPad Pro and Macs. Even my ipad2 is
shockingly more reliable than any of my top end Samsung tabs (unless I strip
them right down and use custom OS).
> >
> > To confirm, I’m not offended or upset. I just think the comment
was unfair and exaggerated. They break for sure, but not to the extent to
‘refuse’ it. Roids way of avoiding breaking is to only offer minor device OS
updates and expect you to bin old devices after a couple of years (apposed to
the 6-8years for Apple).
> >
> > Peace.
> >
> > Sean Cole
> > Pi Digital Prod Ltd
> >
> >> On 19 Oct 2019, at 16:57, Jjs via use-livecode
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Who still wants Apple or iOs, everything breaks with them.
They never heard of backwards compatibility. If someone wants Apple or iOs,
just refuse it. To much hassle, and costs to much.
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
