> On 8 Oct 2019, at 21:42, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > And here is a May 2016 update: > > https://livecode.com/trevor-devore-interviews-kevin-mark-on-infinite-livecode/ > > > A small number of people keep going round and round on this a large number of > times. > > How many times will the same conversation happen before more recent > information is absorbed?
An excellent article. Which part was you pointing to in reference to Lagi’s question about older campaigns funded that have still not met the core? And which part do you refer to when asserting that absorption of info is needed to reduce the same conversations recursion rate? Note: I’m not inferring any kind of ill intent on LCs part. Just seeking clarification on up to date stances as a 2016 discussion is itself 3yrs old now. Sean Cole Pi Digital Prod Ltd _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
