Hehe. That statistic is served by DoubleClick. Definitely NOT to be trusted! It’s also self-serving to Google’s narrative. Click the link to drill down to the source details and Safari blocks it as untrustworthy. Chrome doesn’t but that’s because it’s made by Google!! 53% at 3 seconds indeed. That’s probably people not trusting google ads and just trying to get back off those pages they’ve been redirected to.
Sean Cole Pi Digital Prod Ltd > On 8 Oct 2019, at 12:46, Pi Digital <s...@pidigital.co.uk> wrote: > > That would be true for a ‘page’ that did not load in 3 sec but if you have a > loading bar they would probably be more willing. > > While developing for HTML5 I have to post up to the website and then refresh > the page to reload the whole thing which takes about 10 seconds. But even > after repeated times of this it has not become uncomfortable. > > I also don’t trust this statistic of 3 seconds. Count out 3 seconds and see > if that feels uncomfortable to you to give up. 53% is a ridiculous number for > that level of impatience. Remember that 87.6543 % of statistics are made up. > > Sean Cole > Pi Digital Prod Ltd > >>> On 7 Oct 2019, at 20:35, JJS via use-livecode >>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: >>> >> by the way scroll a bit down, you'll read: 53% of the website visitors will >> click away if it does not load within 3 seconds. >> >> Think again about the html5 export...too slow to load. >> >> Then you are better off writing a html page yourself and add html5 stuff in >> it, mucho faster >> >> >> Op 7-10-2019 om 21:31 schreef JJS via use-livecode: >>> mmmm, while on the other hand you can put something extra on your website >>> and it can be installable as a webapp on your mobile, so that it becomes >>> faster than ever to load. >>> >>> https://developers.google.com/web/progressive-web-apps >>> >>> Op 7-10-2019 om 18:18 schreef Bob Sneidar via use-livecode: >>>> Because Apple is no longer going to accept apps that are nothing more than >>>> a web portal. >>>> >>>>> On Oct 5, 2019, at 05:47 , R.H. via use-livecode >>>>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Let us face the fact that today's browsers are capable of almost >>>>> everything you want to do with a rich application. Why should I develop >>>>> even desktop applications and mobile apps if pretty much the same can be >>>>> done in a modern browser? OK, it only has a single page interface, but do >>>>> people care? Already, even in LC, I am mostly developing for single page >>>>> interface design anyway and do not use separate windows. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> use-livecode mailing list >>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >>>> subscription preferences: >>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> use-livecode mailing list >>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >>> subscription preferences: >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode >> >> _______________________________________________ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
