I just tried 2 apps that I built in LC 9.5 business. I have Catalina beta 7 
installed. Neither app was code signed or notarized. I moved the apps to that 
machine via a thumb drive and did not zip compress either one. They both 
launched on Catalina beta without complaint. 

Next I zipped one of the apps and uploaded to my server and then downloaded it 
to the Catalina beta. This time when I tried to open, I got the message that it 
could not be opened because its integrity couldn’t be verified. The only 
options were “Move to trash” or “cancel”

I then right clicked and chose Open and again got the warning about not being 
able to verify but now had an additional option to open, which it did. I quit 
and opened again - this time with no warnings or trouble.

I did just get a notice that beta 8 is available. Will test when I get it 
installed.

Marty

> On Sep 11, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Richmond via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> The most telling test is if anyone who has a Catalina beta installed runs off 
> a Macintosh
> standalone and sees if they can run it themselves: wether from the Open 
> Source version or
> one of the commercial versions.
> 
> Richmond.
> 
> On 11.09.19 18:21, Dar Scott Consulting via use-livecode wrote:
>> Keeping a clear look at things... That $100/yr does include "beta OS 
>> releases, advanced app capabilities, technical support, and tools to 
>> develop, test, and distribute apps." At one time one could get past OSs, but 
>> I don't think it is the case now. And you could go down to the test 
>> warehouse and test on old machines.
>> 
>> On the Windows side, I have used MSDN Universal ($2200/yr) and MSDN 
>> Operating Systems ($700/yr) in the past. The latter might be comparable to 
>> the Apple Developer membership. Well, it was when you could get past OSes 
>> from Apple.
>> 
>> I have seen ads for codesigning certs that work for both Apple and Windows. 
>> I don't know what that means. And I don't know why the fees for 2nd and 3rd 
>> years are so high.
>> 
>> Dar
>> 
>> Senior Consultant
>> Dar Scott Consulting
>> 
>> Mad Scientist
>> darzLab
>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2019, at 2:38 AM, JJS via use-livecode 
>>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The ratio of money asked from devs is also of course: (considered mobile)
>>> 
>>> Mobile Operating Systems    Percentage Market Share
>>> Mobile Operating System Market Share Worldwide - August 2019
>>> Android     76.23%
>>> iOS         22.17%
>>> KaiOS       0.59%
>>> Unknown     0.26%
>>> Samsung     0.21%
>>> Windows     0.2%
>>> 
>>> So apple iOs is somewhat increasing this year, in 2018 it was 15% worldwide.
>>> 
>>> Apple asks 100$ yearly --iOs/ (and macOS)
>>> 
>>> Google ask 25$ one time fee -- Android
>>> 
>>> Amazon is FREE ! (for the time being) -- Kindle which is just Android
>>> 
>>> You can also use other platforms for free like Fdroid
>>> 
>>> Beats me why Apple charges so much yearly while the gain i think is to 
>>> lower that cost as they earn money from your sales anyway.
>>> 
>>> Is there an alternative platform for iOs/macOs ?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Op 11-9-2019 om 07:57 schreef Peter Reid via use-livecode:
>>>> I've been reading the responses to my original posting with interest. My 
>>>> thoughts are as follows:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Matthias Rebbe's tutorial and helper stack seem to be excellent and 
>>>> appear to be the best way of complying with Apple's requirements, for now. 
>>>> Let's hope that Matthias can maintain this as Apple move the goalposts 
>>>> over time! If Matthias is unable to sustain these aids I'd hope that the 
>>>> LC mothership would adopt them.
>>>> 
>>>> 2. A lot of the apps I develop are used by immediate friends and family 
>>>> (and a tiny circle of customers). They are private developments for use in 
>>>> closed communities. Apple have no right to be involved in these and the 
>>>> extended development cycle caused by their involvement is just unnecessary 
>>>> pain.
>>>> 
>>>> 3. If Apple's measures really did provide bullet-proof protection the pain 
>>>> could be justified given the gain. However we know that this protection 
>>>> process is continuous and it becomes more and more onerous over time 
>>>> whilst still providing partial protection for a limited time.
>>>> 
>>>> 4. If the Apple measures were a simple switchable setting I could switch 
>>>> them off whilst I check the user experience for a new user. Then I could 
>>>> switch the features back on to see the fully Apple-ised experience. As it 
>>>> is now, using the current Catalina beta on my development Mac, I see no 
>>>> blocking or warnings. So I've no way of testing the user experience on my 
>>>> development Mac. I have to find another Mac to act as my newbie user. Even 
>>>> then if such a Mac has been a previous newbie, how do you neutralise it to 
>>>> relive the newbie experience?
>>>> 
>>>> 5. The $100 charge each year is inexcusable. Basically Apple are saying 
>>>> "We'll make any app development more tedious unless you pay up $100 every 
>>>> year.". Even the development of the simplest app, to be used as a 
>>>> temporary tool by a couple of friends will be blighted by warnings,  etc. 
>>>> if you don't pay $100 per year and jump through the hoops! Apple are 
>>>> deliberately making life more difficult and charging us $100 a year for 
>>>> the privilege!
>>>> 
>>>> 6. I wonder how much developer time world-wide is wasted jumping through 
>>>> Apple's hoops, especially those developers without the benefit of LC and 
>>>> Matthias' tools?
>>>> 
>>>> 7. If a new-to-LC developer wants to do the usual "Hello World" trivial 
>>>> 1st app (making an executable standalone app), they have to understand 
>>>> code-signing, notarising and stapling, DMG/ZIP creation and be 
>>>> signed/paid-up Apple developers.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks to Matthias, you're a life/sanity saver, but I still find the 
>>>> prospects as an app developer rather depressing!
>>>> 
>>>> Peter
>>>> --
>>>> Peter Reid
>>>> Loughborough, UK
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
>>>> subscription preferences:
>>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to