Well, in spite of appearing to logroll hereabouts, my initial point
should not be overlooked:
"As someone who is engaged on a long, drawn-out refactoring on my main
codebase;
a process that involves uncovering old code (max 9 years) that ranges
from 'slightly clunky'
to 'utter crap' I have NO sympathy with phrases such as "when the code
was written" when
relating to something that is extremely antiquated. "
While embryos in the womb may have to rehearse their evolutionary path,
LiveCode should not have to, and it would be greatly improved were its
appendix and other evolutionary left-overs excised
or replaced by something up-to-date.
Richmond.
On 4.05.19 0:07, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
On 5/3/19 10:38 AM, Richmond via use-livecode wrote:
Err: slightly wooden after a long day at work . . .
Richmond.
On 3.05.19 20:26, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote:
On 5/3/19 10:06 AM, Richmond via use-livecode wrote:
As someone who is engaged on a log
!!!
Must have been lumbering along all day.
Now you're bored stiff.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
