Wow. Didn't know that. Thanks, I'll check it out on PC. On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Scott Rossi <sc...@tactilemedia.com> wrote:
> Recently, Chipp Walters wrote: > > > I'd like to have an easy way to be able to use a group 'dialog box' > inside a > > script and of course could not use a wait until mouseclick() or other > cycle > > stealing technique. I'd be interested to know if anyone has figured out > how > > to do this. > > In my experience, "wait until condition" doesn't steal cycles, at least on > OS X. I tried this quick test with a graphic acting as the dialog: > > [ In a button ] > > global dlogActive > > on mouseUp > show grc "dlog" > put true into dlogActive > wait until (dlogActive is false) with messages > hide grc "dlog" > end mouseUp > > [ In the graphic ] > > global dlogActive > > on mouseUp > put false into dlogActive > end mouseUp > > Looking at Activity Monitor, there doesn't appear to be any appreciable > processor use during the wait. Seems to work. > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > > Scott Rossi > Creative Director > Tactile Media, UX Design > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > -- Chipp Walters CEO, Shafer Walters Group, Inc. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
