OK, this is definitely odd. I just double checked and I do not see my library stack in the LC Application browser. This is after issuing the start using command from the preOpenCard handler of the first card in my application stack. Using LC 4.6.2 on OS X 10.6.8. I know the stack is loaded because my app wouldn't work without it, plus I see it listed in the mainstacks and the stacksinuse. What am I doing differently? Pete Molly's Revenge <http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Ken Ray <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If you issue a "start using" command, the named stack doesn't show up in > the > > IDE, but that would mean moving the support stacks out of the current > main > > stack.... > > Sorry, Pete... doing a "start using" loads the stack into memory but it is > also shown in the App Browser (same as the "there is a stack" method). > > @Scott: I don't think there's a way to make a stack "loaded" but not > visible to LC in some way. Worst case scenario if you knew where the stack > was that you needed stuff from you could open, grab what you need, then > close and purge the stack from memory so that it never appears in the LC IDE > at all. > > Ken Ray > Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. > Email: [email protected] > Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ > > > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Kennan Ray <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> You could load the stack into memory nut not open it by using the trick: > >> > >> get (there is a stack <pathToAStack>) > >> > >> This would put it in the "mainstacks" but NOT in the "openStacks". > >> > >> I think that would hide it from the Windows menu but may not keep it out > of > >> the Application Browser (I'm not at a computer so I can't confirm that). > >> > >> Ken Ray > >> Sons of Thunder Software > >> > >> On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Scott Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Is there any way to "hide" a stack from the LiveCode IDE while keeping > >> the > >>> stack available to other open stacks? I'm not referring to visibility, > >> but > >>> rather inclusion in open stack lists. > >>> > >>> I have a tool stack which is built for use in the IDE that has a couple > >> of > >>> support stacks it uses for scripts and objects. Is there any way to > >> "hide" > >>> the support stacks from such lists as the Application Browser and the > >> Window > >>> menu so that they don't clutter up the user's IDE, but are still > >> available > >>> to my tool stack? > >>> > >>> Thanks for any recommendations. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Scott Rossi > >>> Creative Director > >>> Tactile Media, UX Design > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> use-livecode mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > >> subscription preferences: > >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> use-livecode mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > >> subscription preferences: > >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > use-livecode mailing list > > [email protected] > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
