This might be easier to do with merge.
As an example:
*function resolveValue mySillyVar*
* repeat until mySillyVar contains "[[" -- when merge can't replace the
value inside brackets they are left*
* put mySillyVar into mySillyTmp -- mySillytmp is the working var*
* put "[[" before mySillyTmp -- bracketize mySillyTmp so merge can try
it out.*
* put "]]" after mySillyTmp*
* put mySillyVar & ":" & merge(mySillyTmp) & return after tOut --
putput mySillyVar string followed by merged mySillyTmp*
* put merge(mySillyTmp) into mySillyVar -- setup the next loop. If the
merge failed, brackets are left in string so loop exits*
* end repeat*
* replace "[[" with empty in tOut -- remove extraneous brackets*
* replace "]]" with empty in tOut*
* return tOut*
*end resolveValue*
The following handler:
*on mouseUp*
* put merge("line 2 of field [[quote]]inField[[quote]]") into myVar --
just sets up the string*
* put empty -- empty message box*
* put resolveValue(myVar)*
*end mouseUp*
Will return evaluated pairs like so:
*line 2 of field "inField":the short name of this card*
*the short name of this card:hi mom*
*hi mom:hi mom *
*
*
No deep testing done, so problems might crop up. Does seem to work ok.
Just realized that if the merge resolves to a string containing brackets the
loop will exit, so some checks will be needed for that possibility.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Timothy Miller <
gand...@doctortimothymiller.com> wrote:
> In the process of getting a slightly tricky script to work, I've been
> pondering the "do" command and the native value function.
>
> I've made an inference. I suspect one could get along without the "do"
> command by judiciously employing the value function, e.g., value(foo) or
> "the value of foo"
>
> I haven't tested this thoroughly yet. Is it true? If it's true, it helps me
> understand "do" a little better. If not, there's something I'm not getting.
>
> While on the topic of the value function...
>
> Lets say value(mySillyVar) = line 2 of field "foo"
>
> And then value(line 2 of field "foo") resolves to "the short name of this
> card"
>
> And the short name of this card = Hi Mom
>
> Will value(foo) resolve to "Hi Mom" ?
>
> I tried it in a test stack. After some trial and error, it seems that
> value(mySillyVar) forces only one evaluation. It produces line 2 of field
> "foo"
>
> Further experimentation reveals, to my surprise, that
>
> value(value(mySillyVar))
>
> actually does resolve to "Hi Mom"
>
> How many times can you nest the value function? I did look in the
> documentation, couldn't find the answer.
>
> I haven't tried this in a "do" statement. If I wanted to resolve a nested
> value "all the way down" would one "do" statement work, or would I have to
> put value functions inside the do statement?
>
> I understand that if I ever actually need
> value(value(value(value(mySillyVar)))) I'm probably doing it the hard way.
> One might suffer a brain aneurysm while trying to maintain a script like
> that.
>
> You've heard of visual learners, tactile learners and olfactory learners?
> I've always been a learn-by-messing-around-learner. (It's also called
> "ADHD")
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
