I think hacking is a term that is used loosely to mean any kind of security 
compromise. It's used mostly by the media who are communicating with a market 
that in the lowest common denominator would not be able to define the 
difference between a hack and a crack, or a virus and a trojan. That is why I 
believe this is the result of some kind of key logging trojan. If someone found 
a way to successfully hack an iTunes store account, the number would not be 
55,000 it would be more like 5,000,000. 
Bob


On Jan 7, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Keith Clarke wrote:

> Maybe but is there actual proof of hacking - or could this be the far more 
> likely human trait of stupidity? 
> Perhaps these 50,000 accounts just belong to the numpties whose password = 
> 'password', '12345' or similar? 
> 
> On 7 Jan 2011, at 16:57, Colin Holgate wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jan 7, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
>> 
>>> The same password in AES-256 would take 1.2 million years. 
>> 
>> 
>> From Wikipedia:
>> 
>> A device that could check a billion billion (1018) AES keys per second would 
>> in theory require about 3×1051 years to exhaust the 256-bit key space.
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
>> preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to