however, iPhone users do have an expectation on how things work, and especially with a device of this type most users "just want it to work" without confusion. Not much room for creative variation, but that's the way it is.
On 27 December 2010 04:53, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/27/2010 09:45 AM, RevList wrote: > >> I have been coding my app for the iPhone and things are going reasonably >> well on the coding side now that I am running 4.5.3 (rc3) >> >> Coding right now is not the issue, though I am sure I will run into all >> sorts of issues soon as I start to add more functionality. >> What I am really struggling with is how to make my controls look like >> native controls. Right now, the app looks like it was designed for >> Windows 3.1 or Mac OS 6. >> > > What was wrong with Mac OS 6 as far as GUI was concerned? > > Far, far better than Windows 3.1 at the very least . . . :) > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I am not convinced by the "unified GUI" theory: i.e. that very > program has to look as if it were designed by one person > with one set of ideas how a GUI should look. > > Discuss . . . > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > -- Stephen Barncard San Francisco Ca. USA more about sqb <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar> _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
