On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Allan Caeg <allanc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jan-Christoph! > Kirk and I are discussing this. We have a google wave discussion, but > nothing much is going on, unfortunately. We've been busy with other things, > but this is definitely on the to do list (and my "drafts" email folder) . I > was actually planning to PM you too (been on my google calendar for about 3 > times, believe it or not).
Cool, just add me to the Wave. :) > Enough with the excuses. Let's talk about next steps. We have some > wireframes and personas. It also appears that you also have some stuff over > there. Can you put them > on http://live.gnome.org/UsabilityProject/Whiteboard/UsabilityTestingSuite so > we can document the progress? Yep, I already put my findings there. Currently I am just trying and coding, I have yet to start with a UI. I guess it is really something like Silverback we are after. Currently I like the Python script way the most because it is insanely portable and easy to adjust (+ I can’t do anything else right now ;). Just like Allan Day said earlier: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/usability/2009-December/msg00073.html – I did the test on a clean live USB system. But I am going to look into Quickly for development the next days. The performance problems can be beaten by lowering the output video resolution, but with a compiled app we might get better speeds even at full quality. We should do it similar to Silverback: Write all the captured stuff separately at highest quality to intermediate formats so we can later export it in any quality & combination we like. _______________________________________________ usability mailing list usability@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
