On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Philip Ganchev <phil.ganc...@gmail.com>wrote:

> This could be a disadvantage because it would interfere with
> habituation. The user would always have to check if the command they
> want is in the position they expect, in case the computer has learned
> since the last time the user used the command.
>
> Anton, sorry but I still do not understand the purpose of your idea.
> It might help if you give an example use-case.  Is the purpose the
> same as with my idea (text search for menu items and any other
> commands)? If so, then I think we should evaluate and compare our
> design choices. Do you agree?


I agree. This was just a thought about possible ways to go but I think that
the best way for a start would be only search for commands (e.g. menuitems +
desctiptions). One of the reasons why this was discussed was the possibility
of the space not being enough to display all items. Do you have any ideas
how this could be done?



> How do I request the group: text search? Can it show commands (menu
> items) that are in different menus. For example, when I type  "scal",
> it will find "Layer -> Scale layer..." and "Image -> Scale image..."?


Yes text search that searches for all the text available in the current
menus + descriptions.



> And a huge advantage in finding the action you want (compared to
> looking through the menus) and streamlining the user input (compared
> to mousing through the menus).
>
> Natural language may be good, but it is likely to be difficult to
> design and implement well. We should pick the low-lying fruit (text
> search) now, thus creating a framework to incorporate NL with more
> thought.


I totally agree with you here. It is good to start simple and evolve the
system over time when people learn how to use it and request more
intelligent ways of showing the items.

I will write use cases but wouldn't it be better to make a wiki page? And if
yes where I can do that (which section so on ...)?

-- 
Anton
_______________________________________________
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Reply via email to