So? Only root can do that... I don't see the problem.
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 14:49 -0600, Kevin D. Carlson wrote:

> I would assume they're referring to the fact that you can (with root
> access) look at any image that exists in any folder that the user has
> loaded in Nautilus. Even if they didn't look at it, it's still there.
> 
> On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 01:38 -0400, Caleb Marcus wrote:
> > Can you explain how the thumbnails are a privacy breach?
> > On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 01:13 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I am not sure if this is the right place to discuss these two issues, 
> > > but I feel they are important enough. As a tentative convert from 
> > > Windows (still dual booting, though with an increasingly share on the 
> > > Ubuntu/Gnome side of the divide) I have come across two potential deal 
> > > killers:
> > > 
> > > time stamps: I know I can use cp -p, but is there a similar 
> > > functionality in Nautilus? and if there is, why isn't it default?
> > > <http://panospace.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/i-want-my-time-stamps-back/>
> > > 
> > > privacy: making thumbnails of every inserted media to a folder in the 
> > > user's home folder is a privacy breach. are those making the design 
> > > decisions aware of it? if so, has there been a discussion of the 
> > > benefits, alternatives and trade-offs? is there an option I am not aware 
> > > of to disable thumbnail caching for some or all media?
> > > <http://panospace.wordpress.com/2008/03/24/i-want-my-privacy-back/>
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > Yuv
> > _______________________________________________
> > Usability mailing list
> > Usability@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Usability mailing list
Usability@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Reply via email to