On Sun, 1 Oct 2006, Martin Ejdestig wrote: > Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 00:49:43 +0200 > From: Martin Ejdestig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected], Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Usability] gnome-screensaver configuration (or lack therof) > > On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 22:49 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > --- Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You are more than welcome to write your own or fork > > > gnome-screensaver. > > > The GPL is designed to allow those who disagree > > > with the direction of > > > a project to take it a new direction. > > > > That's not a very helpful answer. > > Well, it's true.
Please refrain from such antagonistic behaviour. I think we can safely say RTFM and suggesting a fork are responses which almost go without saying should be used only as a last resort, and perhaps are less helpful than no response at all. If the submitter could be more specific about which exacty screensave he wants to configure we might be able to sugges an alternative approach. (The image slideshow screensaver might be an example of a screensaver which really doesn't need to be configured.) -- Alan _______________________________________________ Usability mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
