Hey guys, I'd just like to apologize for the mess I've caused. When I started the thread I had no intention of creating such controversy. I'm sorry for the ruckus I've caused and hope we can all treat the problem with the seriousness it deserves.
Jo is correct. "Offensive" is a relative term. A bible may be the holiest book on earth to one and the most offensive bile to another. Such is the human condition and we should account for it appropriately. *There are two solutions I see:* remove the "Apps available for download" portion of the apps lens (its pretty useless anyway) or restrict the "apps available for download" to Ubuntu provided software until enough information is gathered for an algorithm to know that the user would like pornographic, religious, or other *sensitive*information to be displayed. I hope these solutions are reasonable and appropriate and can be agreed upon with relative ease. Again I apologize and I sincerely hope that we can all continue our professional relationships in a friendly and peaceable manner. Thanks, Colton
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
