On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad < joerlend.schins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In lenses, it is not obvious what the filters do, if anything at all. It > might be understood as the search phrase being the filter and that the > results are the Filter results. From my testing, I don't think I've seen > any user clicking on that text in order to display the filters. In order to > make it easier for new-comers to explore and learn how things work, I > propose the following; > > Filters should be displayed by default. That way, when the user first > explores the system, he or she will immediately know what the filters do > and that there are different filters for different lenses. This is > important knowledge. > > The header should not only display "Filter results", but should also > display a smaller "show" or "hide" the same way that categories do when you > can show more results. This will make it more obvious what filters are and > how to show or hide them. > > Some users prefer to browse applications by category. Those who do, should > see the categories by default, and those who don't should understand how to > hide them. It should not be necessary to keep displaying the categories > every time you open the applications lens. Since the filters are displayed > by default, if they are hidden, that means the user has understood how to > show or hide them. Therefore, the visibility of the filters should be > remembered forever on a per-lens basis. Having to repeat the same task over > and over for no obvious reason, is very annoying. As long as the situation > doesn't change, I should not be required to perform actions. > > Whether or not the selections in the filters pane should be remembered, I > don't know. Whereas the filters visibility affects your general workflow, > the actual filter selection is probably more temporary. If I open the > calculator once, I'm not sure that means Accessories is an important enough > category to require me to unselect it the next time I want to run > something. For these reasons, I think I'd probably prefer that filter > visibility is remembered forever, but the actual filter state be forgotten > when the dash is closed. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Jo-Erlend Schinstad > Reasonable, well-justified and simple suggestions. +1 Evan
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp