On 1/31/2019 12:55 AM, Tex via Unicode
wrote:
As with the many problems with walls not being effective, you choose to ignore the legitimate issues pointed out on the list with the lack of italic standardization for Chinese braille, text to voice readers, etc. The choice of plain text isn't always voluntary. And the existing alternatives, like math italic characters, are problematic. The underlying issue is the lack of rich text support in places where users expect rich text. The solution is to find ways to enable rich text layers that are not full documents and make them interoperable. The solution is not to push this into plain text - which then becomes lowest common denominator rich text instead. A./ |
- Re: Encoding italic Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Martin J . Dürst via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Kent Karlsson via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Andrew Cunningham via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic Phake Nick via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic... Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A las... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A last mis... Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A las... wjgo_10...@btinternet.com via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A las... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Encoding italic (was: A... wjgo_10...@btinternet.com via Unicode