Markus Scherer wrote: > I think "recommended" could be renamed to "(expected to be) widely > implemented".
That's a modest improvement; it shifts from an advisory health warning not to use certain sequences to what it is, speculation that some sequences will be far better supported in the field than others. I still don't see why this distinction is necessary. It's not made for other emoji or non-emoji. I have no fonts for Tai Tham,¹ which has been in Unicode since 2009, but I don't see any warnings against using Tai Tham because someone like me might not have a font for it. ¹ No, I'm not looking for one; that isn't the point. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
