Q1: neutral Q2: annoying Q3: reducing value of the list for me Le jeu. 10 sept. 2015 20:10, Peter Constable <[email protected]> a écrit :
> I was having an offline discussion with someone regarding certain topics > that may show up on this list on occasion, and the question came up of what > evidence we might have of sentiment on the list. So, I thought I’d conduct > a simple straw poll — respond if you feel inclined. > > > > The questions are framed around this hypothetical scenario: Suppose I were > to post a message to the list describing some experiment I did, creating a > Web page containing (say) some Latin characters — not obscure, > just-added-in-Unicode-8 characters, but ones that have been in the standard > for some time; that my process for creating the file was to use (say) > Notepad and entering HTML numeric character references; and that my > findings were that it worked. > > > > Q1: Would you find that to be an interesting post that adds makes your > participation in the list more useful, or would you find it a noisy > distraction that reduces the value you get from participating in the list? > > > > Q2: If I were to send messages along that line on a regular basis, would > that add value to your participation in the list, or reduce it? > > > > Q3: If 50 people (still a small portion of the list membership) were to > send messages along that line on a regular basis, would that add value to > your participation in the list, or reduce it? > > > > > > > > Peter > > >
