2014-04-02 21:56, Whistler, Ken wrote:
U+23AF is *definitely* not a variation selector at all.
It is part of a set of bracket pieces (and other graphic pieces)
in the range U+239B..U+23B1.
[…]
These glyphic pieces of symbols are only relevant and useful
in the context of mathematical typesetting programs like TeX.
I’m not sure whether TeX uses such characters at all. TeX is oriented
towards typesetting glyphs, often not caring that much about abstract
characters. When I use, say, $$\begin{pmatrix}…\end{pmatrix} in LaTeX to
get a nicely formatted array with large parentheses around, I don’t
think LaTeX internally uses characters like U+239B.
On the other hand, such characters can be used in very primitive
“typesetting” in a plain text environment under some conditions. For
example, to create a largish left parentheses I could use U+239B U+239C
… U+239C U+239D each at the start of a new line:
⎛
⎜
⎜
⎝
This won’t work on everyone’s email reader, of course. It works in
Notepad, for example. On a web page, it works when you set the text
solid, with line-height: 1. Of course, there would be the issue of font
coverage, but I don’t see any particular reason why such characters
could not be used in plain text, in word processors, in HTML
documents—apart from the practical point that there are usually better
alternaties.
U+23AF is a simpler building block, but it has its problems, too.
Despite the purpose mentioned in a comment in the standard, there is no
guarantee that it joins smoothly with adjacent simple arrows. But of
course it is a graphic character, and one that can be expected to have a
rather specific shape. It’s not something abstract that says that some
arrow should be extended; rather, it can be used as an extension.
Yucca
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
