On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:01:14 -0700 Asmus Freytag <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 03/21/2013 04:48 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote: > >> However, distinguishing U+00B7 and U+0387 would fail spectacularly > >> of the text had been converted to form NFC before you received it. > That's a claim for which the evidence isn't yet solid and if it could > be made solid would make that claim very interesting. > However, even if standard canonical decompositions can be mistaken, > tunneling isn't really a fool-proof answer, because it assumes that > data didn't get normalized en route. Isn't that the key part of what I said above? Richard.
