On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Erkki I Kolehmainen <[email protected]> wrote: > It may also be the result of a negotiating process within a special purpose > user group.
I also see no problem with the current definition. Since the whole point of the standard is to ease the exchange of text if a particular section of the PUA is to be useful in exchange of text among a certain community (say the users of a conscript) then there has to be an implicit or explicit private agreement among them regarding that section of the PUA. Even when you use a font which contains a particular glyph at a PUA code point, you "agree" to use that codepoint to represent that written form. -- Shriramana Sharma
