On 17 Dec 2011, at 16:49, Raymond Mercier wrote: > I agree that the Hittite signs are a relatively small subset of those used in > Sumerian, Akkadian, etc., but the values so often differ that it seems to me > that a separate listing of the Hittite usage is appropriate.
The value of "c" is [k] [s] [ts] [tʃ] [ʔ] and so on. > Compare the CJK signs: the Japanese -kun and -on readings are included in > unihan along with the Chinese readings. Oh... you'd like annotations to the names list? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
