> http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/unicodeset.jsp?a=\p{script:latin}&b=\p{name:/LATIN/}
I could not view above link. I use FireFox. It gives me error as: > 502 Proxy Error > > The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. > The proxy server could not handle the request GET > /cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp. > > Reason: Error reading from remote server Is there a working link for FireFox as well? Tulasi Ps: Thanks Rick McGowan for letting me know about the error, resending From: Mark Davis ☕ <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:37:17 -0700 Subject: Re: Latin Script To: Tulasi <[email protected]> Cc: Unicode Mailing List <[email protected]>, Doug Ewell <[email protected]>, Edward Cherlin <[email protected]> See the following for the (*many*) differences between characters with the Latin script, and those with LATIN in their names. http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/unicodeset.jsp?a=\p{script:latin}&b=\p{name:/LATIN/} I'd suggest taking a more focused approach to learning about the standard, rather than trying relatively scattershot questions to this list. You might read through at least the first 3 chapters of the Unicode Standard, plus the Scripts UAX. These are all online for free at unicode.org. Mark — Il meglio è l’inimico del bene — On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 20:55, Tulasi <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks like Unicode did not create any name for any Latin letter/symbol > with LATIN in its name :-') > > Am I correct? > > Is there a mailing list for ISO/IEC ? > > > I don't think it's necessary to post these glyphs to the public list. > > Better to do like Edward Cherlin, i.e., type the symbol after the name. > > e.g., LATIN SMALL LETTER PHI (ɸ) > > That way an illiterate like me can quickly see the letter/symbol along > with its name, without additional research. > > > The merger between Unicode and ISO 10646 caused a few character names in > > Unicode to be changed to match the 10646 names. > > My I know these letters/symbols with names please? > > Tulasi > PS: Thanks Doug, especially for posting the links > > > From: Doug Ewell <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:09:41 -0600 > Subject: Re: Latin Script > To: Unicode Mailing List <[email protected]> > Cc: Tulasi <[email protected]> > > "Tulasi" <tulasird at gmail dot com> wrote: > > >> U+00AA FEMININE ORDINAL INDICATOR (which does not contain "LATIN") is > >> considered part of the Latin script, while U+271D LATIN CROSS (which > >> does) is considered common to all scripts. > > > > Can you post both symbols please, thanks? > > I can point you to http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0080.pdf , which > includes a glyph for U+00AA, and > http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2700.pdf , which includes a glyph for > U+271D. I don't think it's necessary to post these glyphs to the public > list. > > > Trying to know who among ISO and Unicode first created the names' list > > for Latin-script is not an indication of obsession :-') > > > > So among Unicode and ISO/IEC, who first created ISO/IEC 8859-1 & > > ISO/IEC 8859-2 letters/symbols names with each name with LATIN in it? > > Most of the characters in the various parts of ISO 8859 were originally > standardized before Unicode or ISO 10646, so the names were probably > either created by the ISO/IEC subcommittees responsible for those parts, > or found in earlier standards and adopted as-is. > > The merger between Unicode and ISO 10646 caused a few character names in > Unicode to be changed to match the 10646 names. > > -- > Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org > RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s
