2010/6/9 Masaaki Shibata <[email protected]> > The result of CP x PO must be the same on both rule-based and regex > implementation (i.e. "×") anyhow. >
why that? NU x CP x PO but CL ÷ PO regexp-based implementation can look forward and backward for NU but pairtable-based implementation cann't (well, it can by costs of some overhead and additional complexity). guess, thats a reason why recommended `( PR | PO) ? ( OP | HY ) ? NU (NU | SY | IS) * (CL | CP) ? ( PR | PO) ?` was approximated in LB25. btw, whole note [quote] In general, it is recommended to not break lines inside numbers of the form described by the following regular expression: ( PR | PO) ? ( OP | HY ) ? NU (NU | SY | IS) * (CL | CP) ? ( PR | PO) ? Examples: $(12.35) 2,1234 (12)¢ 12.54¢ The default line breaking algorithm approximates this with the following rule. Note that some cases have already been handled, such as ‘9,’, ‘[9’. For a tailoring that supports the regular expression directly, as well as a key to the notation see Section 8.2, Examples of Customization. [/quote] is related to LB25 and not to LB24 and I think it should be visualized respectively to clarify it's relationship to LB25 Konstantin
