On 01/21/2014 12:14 AM, Tim wrote: > > On 21/01/14 17:03, Erick Brunzell wrote: >> On 01/18/2014 12:11 AM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com >>> <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com>> wrote: >>> >>> I see that Alpha 2 is due next Thursday, Jan 23. >>> >>> Are we going to "opt-in"? >>> >>> If so I'll set up my test suite over the weekend. >>> >>> Lance >>> >>> >>> Hi Lance, >>> >>> Once Kate will send the email, I will jump in to update the list and >>> as always, I shall keep everyone updated :) > What are we waiting for exactly? we should be testing the images already
I'm waiting for Alpha 2 testing to appear on the iso-tracker: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/ Should I just start on the daily's and assume the results will count towards Alpha 2? >>> >>> Thank you for your support, your contributions are much appreciated, >>> as always :) >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa >>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntugnome-qa> >>> Post to : ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net >>> <mailto:ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa >>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntugnome-qa> >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us." >>> Best Regards, >>> amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad> >>> Areas of Involvement >>> <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad/AreasOfInvolvement> >>> My Projects <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad/Projects> >> >> Upon seeing nothing yet I decided to probe a bit further. >> Specifically I also need to test Edubuntu upgrades, both from Precise >> and Saucy since their Precise was a 5 year LTS, and I noticed that >> the upgrade test dates were wrong so I filed a bug: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1271020 >> >> Of course that doesn't directly effect us because Tim wisely included >> the upgrade tests in our iso-testing category :^) >> >> But I'm honestly wondering if we don't need to make the first move >> when it comes to triggering this "opt-in" testing? >> >> I'm personally conflicted as to whether or not we need to "opt-in" or >> "opt-out" of each possible "opt-in" pre-release test, but I think >> with the recent addition of 'gnome-shell' 3.10 we'd be wise to push >> some testing for an Alpha 2. Does Tim agree? > You can assume we are "opt-in" to all alpha/beta releases unless Ali > says otherwise. > > As far as I am concerned I want to see bugs reports! not people asking > if they should be testing ;) You know I've been a reliable tester and bug reporter, and I'll continue to do so :^) >> >> Sorry to be a pain in the neck, >> >> Lance >> >> > > > I'll just start testing and report any problems here as well as the iso-tracker. The beauty of having actual Alpha's and Beta's is providing a proper platform for new testers to "jump in" at the proper point. Lance
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa Post to : ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
