That link is enough:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME

As always Tim makes the complicated seem easy :^)

Lance



________________________________
 From: Tim <t...@feathertop.org>
To: ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net 
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubuntugnome-qa] Moment of Truth
 




On 07/01/14 08:46, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:


>
>
>On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Lance <lbsol...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>It took me nearly four hours to figure out how to create a gnome/bugzilla 
>account and file my first bug so maybe we need to improve the documentation 
>regarding that process.
>>
>>Lance
>>
>>
>
>
>Hi Lance,
>
>
>Bugzilla? AFAIK, we at Ubuntu GNOME are only using Launchpad for reporting 
>bugs :)
>
It is not uncommon for developers to request the Bug reporter to file the Bug 
upstream where relevant, obviously the actual reporter can usually provide more 
info, testing etc. 

That said upstream bugs should really only be submitted once an
    Ubuntu Developer has requested it.


https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME



I have never heard anything such as using both areas for bugs. That is indeed 
why our Testing Wiki Page doesn't explain this in details. Launchpad is what we 
use and what we ask our testers to use:
>
>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/Testing
>
>
>Thank you!
> 
-- 
>
>Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us."
>Best Regards,
>amjjawad
>Areas of Involvement
>My Projects
>
>
>

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa
Post to     : ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa
Post to     : ubuntugnome-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to