I agree that we want to avoid shipping an intermediate solution with
udev rules if xorg.conf.d is the long-term solution.

However, to the server, this will look equivalent to having an xorg.conf
again, won't it?  I know there have been significant behavior
differences (and bugs) in the past between a server with no xorg.conf
and one with an xorg.conf, even minimal.  What sort of plan is there to
regression-test this?

-- 
FFE: xorg.conf.d/inputclass backport
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xorg-server in ubuntu.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to     : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to