Chirs, your right, and there in lays the problem. But it's our own. I made the choice tho run 9.04, knowing it would have some possible problems. So I shouldn't snivel and I now recall that in the download site it say 8.04 is "ideal for larger deployment", which many of us means stable. My problem is newcomers into Ubuntu 9.04 see latest version at the site and so assumes 8.04 means old, which it is. The new user doesn't know that it also means one is considerably more stable than the other. Frustration can them continue the mantra that Linux sucks as an OS which in fact we know it's the best.
Of course this is something to take up in another forum and so I shall. I like the Debian way they simply tell you stable. testing, unstable. And we more knowledgeable users know 9.04 is the testing branch so expect hiccups. SO SORRY FOR THE WHINING, MY BAD!!!!! So to bring this full circle that's why there is Launchpad to post the problems so they can address them, as we have. Thank you for the great work you all do here and please forgive our impassions it's in our nature, or we'd be using 8.04. -- Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in ubuntu. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
